prhp/DD4/13/07/comp

There were a number of issues raised by the Tenant in this case. These are as follows:a. The Tenant submitted that the front door was rotten, poorly fitted and not secure. It was clear from the inspection that the front door facing on the inside had been repaired and the door was now secure. The door appeared to the Committee to be in an acceptable state of repair.b. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to the state of repair of the carpets. It was clear from the Inspection that the carpets in the property had all been replaced.c. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to the decoration of the woodwork and the general decoration in the property. It was clear from the inspection that all the woodwork and walls had been repainted.d. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to damp in the kitchen, bathroom and bedroom but on inspection there was no evidence of damp in the property.e. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to a leak from the bath. Upon inspection it was clear that the bath seal along the side of the bath had been repaired.f. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to the heating in the property. It was clear from inspection that one heater had been reinstalled. Mrs Robertson stated that the heaters had recently been checked and the Committee saw nothing to suggest that the heating was not working properly.g..The Tenant also raised concerns with regard to a crack in the kitchen wall but upon inspection there was no evidence of this.h. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to a blocked drain in the kitchen and the kitchen tap being broken. Upon inspection the drain in the kitchen appeared to be working satisfactorily and the tap had been repaired.i. The Tenant submitted that there was a hole in the window of the front bedroom, but upon inspection there was no evidence of any such hole.j. The Tenant raised concerns with regard to the cooker being damaged. Upon inspection it was

File: